<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>Eu on Nanikore</title>
        <link>https://nanikore.net/tags/eu/</link>
        <description>Recent content in Eu on Nanikore</description>
        <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
        <language>en-gb</language>
        <lastBuildDate>Sun, 03 Jul 2005 02:54:11 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://nanikore.net/tags/eu/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item>
            <title>Just say NO to EU software patents?</title>
            <link>https://nanikore.net/2005/07/03/just-say-no-to-eu-software-patents/</link>
            <pubDate>Sun, 03 Jul 2005 02:54:11 +0000</pubDate>
            <guid>https://nanikore.net/2005/07/03/just-say-no-to-eu-software-patents/</guid>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;Ah. It seems we live in an age where the big player *must* be right, and people don&amp;rsquo;t like buying something from that small shop, by a maker they&amp;rsquo;ve never heard of. Sigh. However, there have been glimmers of hope, especially online where the barriers to acquisition (i.e. download) are so low, and there aren&amp;rsquo;t any real national boundaries, no matter what the FBI and US Secret Service would have you believe.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;It looks of course like that&amp;rsquo;s being threatened to via the EU Software Patents Bill currently due to go through the EU Parliament this week (July 6th). For deeper info, check on the &lt;a class=&#34;link&#34; href=&#34;http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/en/m/intro/index.html&#34;  target=&#34;_blank&#34; rel=&#34;noopener&#34;&#xA;    &gt;NoSoftwarePatents&lt;/a&gt; site. Even Slashdot have covered it a &lt;a class=&#34;link&#34; href=&#34;http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/07/02/1451233&amp;amp;tid=155&amp;amp;tid=17&#34;  target=&#34;_blank&#34; rel=&#34;noopener&#34;&#xA;    &gt;fair amount&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;There&amp;rsquo;s been a lot of &lt;a class=&#34;link&#34; href=&#34;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FUD&#34;  target=&#34;_blank&#34; rel=&#34;noopener&#34;&#xA;    &gt;FUD&lt;/a&gt; on this long running issue, and a lot of it seems to be confusion on what is a &lt;a class=&#34;link&#34; href=&#34;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patent&#34;  target=&#34;_blank&#34; rel=&#34;noopener&#34;&#xA;    &gt;patent&lt;/a&gt; and what is a &lt;a class=&#34;link&#34; href=&#34;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright&#34;  target=&#34;_blank&#34; rel=&#34;noopener&#34;&#xA;    &gt;copyright&lt;/a&gt;. Copyrighting of a way of doing something is fine, patenting it really restricts innovation, especially in software.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;I think what&amp;rsquo;ll happen here is that the rule will pass and big companies will claim patent on all manner of things, rightly or wrongly and subdue the nascent European software scene, meaning fewer big innovations. Sigh.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;</description>
        </item></channel>
</rss>
