<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>My on Nanikore</title>
        <link>https://nanikore.net/tags/my/</link>
        <description>Recent content in My on Nanikore</description>
        <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
        <language>en-gb</language>
        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 May 2004 22:15:54 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://nanikore.net/tags/my/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item>
            <title>MovableType to charge</title>
            <link>https://nanikore.net/2004/05/15/movabletype-to-charge/</link>
            <pubDate>Sat, 15 May 2004 22:15:54 +0000</pubDate>
            <guid>https://nanikore.net/2004/05/15/movabletype-to-charge/</guid>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;Well, just a short time after &lt;a class=&#34;link&#34; href=&#34;http://www.blogger.com/start&#34;  target=&#34;_blank&#34; rel=&#34;noopener&#34;&#xA;    &gt;Blogger&amp;rsquo;s&lt;/a&gt; new look and new features, so Movable Type have announced their MT3 Developer Edition, and hints on the new licensing they&amp;rsquo;ll use. One of the founders &lt;a class=&#34;link&#34; href=&#34;http://www.sixapart.com/corner/archives/2004/05/its_about_time.shtml&#34;  target=&#34;_blank&#34; rel=&#34;noopener&#34;&#xA;    &gt;explains&lt;/a&gt; parts of it, but as you can tell by the comments on the bottom, virtually no-one is in favour of them.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;I haven&amp;rsquo;t fully digested the license, but there&amp;rsquo;s a good chance I would &lt;a class=&#34;link&#34; href=&#34;http://www.sixapart.com/log/2004/05/movable_type_30.shtml&#34;  target=&#34;_blank&#34; rel=&#34;noopener&#34;&#xA;    &gt;have to pay&lt;/a&gt; for MT3 on this site&amp;hellip; or just stay on this version, which is no bad thing. So far MT2.x has been donation ware - if you use it, you can donate money for it if you like. I must say that I DO donate for software like this that I use, and I see no reason not to. Six Apart, the developers of MT, have simply gone Pro on this release and obviously need/want a bit more payback from it. This I can understand, but at the moment some of the fees people are calculating are a huge increase. Remember - a huge increase generally means they were running lots of blog with lots of authors on big machines - maybe even be companies themselves.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;I&amp;rsquo;m sure in the business meeting, Six Apart hoped many people would flock to their &lt;a class=&#34;link&#34; href=&#34;http://www.typepad.com/&#34;  target=&#34;_blank&#34; rel=&#34;noopener&#34;&#xA;    &gt;TypePad&lt;/a&gt; service for smaller blogs, but with Google now pushing their Blogger much more heavily, MT could&amp;rsquo;ve chosen the wrong time to do it. Also, there are now several fully open source Weblog engines around such as &lt;a class=&#34;link&#34; href=&#34;http://wordpress.org/&#34;  target=&#34;_blank&#34; rel=&#34;noopener&#34;&#xA;    &gt;WordPress&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;It&amp;rsquo;s not all over yet. The Developer Edition is not the general release and there is time to Six Apart to amend it, but I don&amp;rsquo;t see it coming - I see a lot of people staying on 2.661, other more tech savvy people getting a different (free) system, and the rest using Blogger.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;In some respects, maybe too many didn&amp;rsquo;t donate?&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Maybe more on this later.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;</description>
        </item></channel>
</rss>
